Hi Romain, I think in CDI 1.0 there is a TCK test that requires us to fail. In CDI 1.1 we have the @TransientReference for this scenarios.
Cheers, Arne Am 10.05.13 10:05 schrieb "Romain Manni-Bucau" unter <[email protected]>: >Hi > >Due to a regression in tomee i looked thus case we dont handle anymore but >not sure it is normal with cdi-140: > >- take a producer which produces sthg dependent not passivation capable >- inject it in a passivationcapable bean through a constructor > >ATM we fail but it should be more or less doable as it should through >setters since the bean can convert it (get a serializable attribute for >instance) >I know it is hard to find and woyld need bytecode analyzis but i find it a >strong limitation (+potential regression) > >Wdyt
