The change in TomEE covered it up, but didn't fix the root issue.  Added a test 
case in OWB that reproduces it using just the BeanManager.

-David

On May 11, 2013, at 1:22 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote:

> -1 David, it was already fixed and was a tomee issue!
> Le 11 mai 2013 05:29, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> 
>> Excellent.  Fixed an issue in OWB that was affecting the TomEE build for a
>> few days (OWB-858 - AnnotatedTypeImpl not thread safe).  Was causing
>> java.util.ConcurrentModificationExceptions.
>> 
>> Hopefully we can get that in there.  Out of time tonight, but would like
>> to find the issue with passivation checking.
>> 
>> 
>> -David
>> 
>> On May 10, 2013, at 10:09 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Yea, but I need to reset the versions to 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT still
>>> 
>>> LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: Arne Limburg <[email protected]>
>>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; Mark
>> Struberg <[email protected]>
>>>> Cc:
>>>> Sent: Friday, 10 May 2013, 15:33
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>> 
>>>> You can build it from trunk
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Arne
>>>> 
>>>> Am 10.05.13 13:36 schrieb "Thomas Andraschko" unter
>>>> <[email protected]>:
>>>> 
>>>>> Is there already a new snapshot available somewhere?
>>>>> I would try it with my current app.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2013/5/10 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'll reroll the release this evening.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We will _not_ exclude the webbeans-cdi11 module from the source
>> release
>>>>>> but we don't ship any binaries for it.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The reason is that we must not ship any CDI-1.1 binaries without
>>>> passing
>>>>>> the TCK. But there is no reason not to ship a mechanism to create a
>>>>>> compat
>>>>>> package.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The reroll will contain Arnes fixes for the AnnotatedType and a few
>>>>>> other
>>>>>> minor things.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>>> strub
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>> From: Arne Limburg <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> To: "[email protected]"
>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> Cc:
>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, 9 May 2013, 18:32
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> T hanks Harald for catching this one.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> That's a serious one. I'll fix it and we re-roll the
>>>> release.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Arne
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Am 09.05.13 18:15 schrieb "Harald Wellmann" unter
>>>>>>> <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> -1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Looks like there is a regression regarding
>>>>>>>> BeforeBeanDiscovery.addAnnotatedType(), compared to 1.1.8.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Adding more than one type has no effect.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The following method in BeanManagerImpl looks suspicious:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>      public void
>>>> addAdditionalAnnotatedType(AnnotatedType<?>
>>>>>>>> annotatedType)
>>>>>>>>      {
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>> webBeansContext.getAnnotatedElementFactory().setAnnotatedType(annotatedTy
>>>>>> p
>>>>>>>> e);
>>>>>>>>          additionalAnnotatedTypes.put(null, annotatedType);
>>>>>>>>      }
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> All additional types are added with the same null key.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>> Harald
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to