Forgot to mention that T is an unbound type variable at class level:
public class MethodTypeProduces1<T>
and there is no subclass of MethodTypeProduces1
Am 06.07.13 10:12 schrieb "Romain Manni-Bucau" unter
<rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
>Wait, not sure google ate a part of the code or not but if a <T> then T
>can
>be String (like ArrayList itself)
>Le 6 juil. 2013 09:18, "Arne Limburg" <arne.limb...@openknowledge.de> a
>écrit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am currently struggling with the handling of generics in OWB, because
>> CDI 1.1 TCK requires us to be much more clever than we are now in this
>>area.
>> However I stumbled about a test in our test-suite that seems to be wrong
>> to me, but I would like to have another opinion.
>> With my local implementation of the generic handling (which is much
>>better
>> than the one in trunk) the following tests fails:
>> MethodProducer1Test.testPersonProducer
>>
>> Basically it tests if an ArrayList with an unbound type variable is
>> injectable into an injection point of type ArrayList<String>:
>>
>> @Produces @Dependent @Named("ProMethodParameterized3")
>>
>> ArrayList<T> methodPT3() {...}
>>
>> and
>>
>> @Inject ArrayList<String> pt3;
>>
>> Reading 5.2.4 of the CDI 1.1 spec (the fourth bullet point) I would
>> suggest that this should lead to an error since String is not assignable
>> from Object (which is the upper bound of T).
>>
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Arne
>>
