Hi Gerhard,

i added a unit test.
It only occurs on multiple specialization -> BeanA -> @Specialized BeanB ->
@Specialized BeanC.
Can i check in and create a issue for it?

It would be great if anyone of you could check it.

Regards,
Thomas



2013/11/28 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]>

> hi thomas,
>
> i did a quick-check and don't see the same effect.
> it would be great, if you provide a small demo which illustrates the issue.
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2013/11/28 Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]>
>
> > Guys, i really need your help!
> > It was introduced in one of the ~300 commits for #344
> > The most revisions event don't compile so i can't find the breaking
> commit!
> >
> > How is it possible that my Bean does not have a @Named in the source code
> > but it's really there in the debugger?
> > Can ASM manipulate this without inheritance? I never looked deeper in
> that
> > byte code generation/manipulation stuff.
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/11/26 Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]>
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > i just upgraded to 1.2.1 and i get this exception.
> > > My @Specialized class does not have a @Named annotation but somehow
> it's
> > > there in the debugger.
> > >
> > > Any idea?
> > >
> > > I must still use 1.1.5 :/
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Thomas
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to