surely when we resolve the injection (normally in validate(beans) but same method is called by bm.validation(injectionPoint)
Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-10-05 20:39 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]>: > Created a small sample here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1022 > AFAICS the injectoin points are validated to early. > > 2014-10-02 14:17 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: > >> it is done when we validate injection points so everything should be there >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> Twitter: @rmannibucau >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> 2014-10-02 14:14 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <[email protected] >> >: >> > It worked fine and now, if i start my app, each time another >> injectionpoint >> > is "invalid". >> > Therefore i don't think it's usefull to share a single bean. >> > The most times it's a simple injection - without alternatives/specializes >> > etc. So nothing special here. >> > >> > Could it be possible that it's to early and not ALL beans are loaded at >> > this time? >> > I have a around 10 jars with beans, maybe it depdends on the order of the >> > jar loading? >> > >> > 2014-10-02 13:59 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: >> > >> >> We validate injection point more drastically now, surely the cause. Can >> you >> >> share AnyBean and where it is injected? >> >> >> >> Le jeudi 2 octobre 2014, Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]> >> a >> >> écrit : >> >> > Fixed! :) >> >> > >> >> > But i really have a weird problem, i get the follwowing exception on >> >> every >> >> > startup with another bean: >> >> > >> >> > javax.enterprise.inject.spi.DeploymentException: >> >> > org.apache.webbeans.exception.WebBeansConfigurationException: Error >> while >> >> > sending SystemEvent to a CDI Extension! >> >> > >> >> >> org.apache.webbeans.portable.events.generics.GProcessAnnotatedType@46573acf >> >> > at >> >> > >> org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer.deploy(BeansDeployer.java:284) >> >> > at >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.bootstrapApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:138) >> >> > at >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.startApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:104) >> >> > at >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> org.apache.webbeans.web.lifecycle.WebContainerLifecycle.startApplication(WebContainerLifecycle.java:89) >> >> > at >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> org.apache.webbeans.servlet.WebBeansConfigurationListener.contextInitialized(WebBeansConfigurationListener.java:86) >> >> > at >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.callContextInitialized(ContextHandler.java:800) >> >> > ... Caused by: >> >> > javax.enterprise.inject.UnsatisfiedResolutionException: Api type >> >> > [de.test.Anybean] is not found with the qualifiers <|Qualifiers: >> >> > [@javax.enterprise.inject.Default()]<|for injection into Field >> Injection >> >> > Point, field name : selectItemNone, Bean Owner : [null] >> >> > at >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> org.apache.webbeans.util.InjectionExceptionUtil.throwUnsatisfiedResolutionException(InjectionExceptionUtil.java:65) >> >> > at >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> org.apache.webbeans.container.InjectionResolver.checkInjectionPoint(InjectionResolver.java:221) >> >> > at >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.validate(BeanManagerImpl.java:1149) >> >> > at >> >> > org.apache.webbeans.util.WebBeansUtil.validate(WebBeansUtil.java:1683) >> >> > at >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.createInjectionTarget(BeanManagerImpl.java:1169) >> >> > at >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> org.apache.webbeans.container.InjectableBeanManager.createInjectionTarget(InjectableBeanManager.java:101) >> >> > at >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> org.apache.deltaspike.core.util.bean.BeanBuilder.readFromType(BeanBuilder.java:116) >> >> > at >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> org.apache.deltaspike.jsf.impl.injection.proxy.ConverterAndValidatorProxyExtension.findConverterAndValidatorsWhichNeedProxiesForDependencyInjectionSupport(ConverterAndValidatorProxyExtension.java:73) >> >> > at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor20.invoke(Unknown Source) >> >> > at >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) >> >> > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) >> >> > at >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> org.apache.webbeans.event.ObserverMethodImpl.invoke(ObserverMethodImpl.java:343) >> >> > at >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> org.apache.webbeans.event.ContainerEventObserverMethodImpl.invoke(ContainerEventObserverMethodImpl.java:82) >> >> > at >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> org.apache.webbeans.event.ObserverMethodImpl.notify(ObserverMethodImpl.java:308) >> >> > at >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> org.apache.webbeans.event.NotificationManager.fireEvent(NotificationManager.java:599) >> >> > at >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.fireEvent(BeanManagerImpl.java:453) >> >> > at >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.fireEvent(BeanManagerImpl.java:438) >> >> > at >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> org.apache.webbeans.util.WebBeansUtil.fireProcessAnnotatedTypeEvent(WebBeansUtil.java:1008) >> >> > at >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer.annotatedTypesFromClassPath(BeansDeployer.java:844) >> >> > at >> >> > >> org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer.deploy(BeansDeployer.java:228) >> >> > at >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.bootstrapApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:138) >> >> > at >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.AbstractLifeCycle.startApplication(AbstractLifeCycle.java:104) >> >> > at >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> org.apache.webbeans.web.lifecycle.WebContainerLifecycle.startApplication(WebContainerLifecycle.java:89) >> >> > at >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> org.apache.webbeans.servlet.WebBeansConfigurationListener.contextInitialized(WebBeansConfigurationListener.java:86) >> >> > >> >> > Works fine with Weld and OWB 1.1.x and OWB 1.2.x. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > 2014-10-02 12:46 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected] >> >: >> >> > >> >> >> @Thomas: +1 WEB-INF/beans.xml is not a valid resource even in tomcat >> >> >> and by spec (servlet) >> >> >> >> >> >> Also ensure to be very up to date since we added few fixes since the >> >> >> announcement >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> >> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau >> >> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >> >> >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >> >> >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 2014-10-02 11:58 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko < >> >> [email protected] >> >> >> >: >> >> >> > Have some problems... >> >> >> > Already created a issue about WEB-INF/beans.xml lookup with a >> possible >> >> >> fix >> >> >> > - please have look at it. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I also have a >> javax.enterprise.inject.UnsatisfiedResolutionException >> >> for >> >> >> a >> >> >> > bean without a deviration. >> >> >> > I will try to find the reason later. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > 2014-10-02 10:37 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko < >> >> >> [email protected]>: >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Great guys, thanks! >> >> >> >> Will test my apps today! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 2014-10-02 10:28 GMT+02:00 Arne Limburg < >> >> [email protected] >> >> >> >: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Yes, >> >> >> >>> I¹ll use that time to work out these ugly generics issues with >> the >> >> >> cdi-tck >> >> >> >>> team, so we can get rid of these ugly hacks in GenericsUtil, that >> >> the >> >> >> tck >> >> >> >>> made us implement. >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> Cheers, >> >> >> >>> Arne >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> Am 01.10.14 20:33 schrieb "Jens Schumann" unter >> >> >> >>> <[email protected]>: >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >Congratulation! >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> >.oO(I always assumed, that we have to wait till the end of >> Arne's >> >> >> >>> >upcoming parental leave;) >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> >> On 01 Oct 2014, at 20:23, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> But we do! >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> Folks, I'm proud to announce that we finally pass the >> standalone >> >> >> part >> >> >> >>> >>of the CDI-1.2 TCK! >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> Please, all do checkout our latest OWB 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT (or >> simply >> >> >> >>> >>compile it yourself [1]) and test YOUR application with it. Any >> >> >> feedback >> >> >> >>> >>is welcome! >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> I like to kick off the release train for OWB tomorrow. >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> We will now continue with cleanup and performance >> improvements. >> >> And >> >> >> >>> >>also with working on the EE TCK over in TomEE. >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> txs and LieGrue, >> >> >> >>> >> strub >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau >> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >> >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >> >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >>
