I'm on org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.extensions.lifecycle.atd.AfterTypeDiscoveryTest


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau


2014-12-20 9:52 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>:
> which test is this exactly?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Saturday, 20 December 2014, 9:30, Romain Manni-Bucau 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Ok, not yet sure it is the tck issue. Seems we really have a bug with
>> addAnnotatedType forgetting to trigger some event (called too late to be
>> automatic). I ll try to have a look soon but wanted to understand the
>> "wording".
>>
>> Thks Mark
>>
>> Le 19 déc. 2014 23:19, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]> a
>> écrit :
>>
>>>  No this is perfectly fine. We discussed this recently and there was a bug
>>>  in Weld. And I guess they just 1:1 moved this bug over to the TCK.
>>>
>>>
>>>  "getAlternatives() returns the ordered list of enabled alternatives
>> for
>>>  the application. Alternative enabled for a bean archive are not included in
>>>  the list."
>>>
>>>  Currently only Alternatives with @Priority are 'enabled alternatives
>> _for
>>>  the application_'! Whereas "Alternative enabled for a bean
>> archive" (means
>>>  via beans.xml) are explicitly NOT enlisted by this method.
>>>
>>>
>>>  Similar wording exists for interceptors and decorators.
>>>
>>>
>>>  Please file a CDITCK issue for it.
>>>
>>>  LieGrue,
>>>  strub
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  > On Friday, 19 December 2014, 19:20, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>  [email protected]> wrote:
>>>  > > Hi guys,
>>>  >
>>>  > is
>> org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer#fireAfterTypeDiscoveryEvent
>>>  > is not correctly implemented?
>>>  >
>>>  > getXXX() should return "list of enabled XXX" but we return
>> only
>>>  > @Priority ones + user should be allowed to remove items from the list
>>>  > but we don't support it.
>>>  >
>>>  > did I misunderstand it?
>>>  >
>>>  > Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>  > @rmannibucau
>>>  > http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>  > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>>  > https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>  >
>>>
>>

Reply via email to