2015-04-30 11:02 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: > I’d rather stay with 1.5.1. > > Yes I did lots of changes, but those changes only affect SPI interfaces > which already got marked as deprecated since a long time. Also those > changes do _not_ affect any end users. They just affect integration. And > there is no single released server out there which already uses 1.5.0. So > we are pretty free to change this still as long as we > > 1.5.0 is released even if not integrated in a released server so too late. This is the more nasty changes since they are invisible but impacting (a bit like adding sleep(15000) in a method ;)).
> a.) make sure we drop a release soon (which I will) > b.) make sure TomEE still runs. And I will make sure that happens as well. > > For me the 1.5.0 release was kind of ‚pre release‘ to make sure we get > feedback. Again: my changes do _not_ affect any users. > > We should have tagged it pre/alpha/beta/something explicit. That said this is wrong since you use the session (even if you dont want to accept it). To be concrete, suppose the session is clustered with hazelcast using a custom serializer, what happens? can bet in some cases it will not run anymore where before it was fine. > Any further ideas and opinion? > > LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 30.04.2015 um 09:30 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected] > >: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > Mark did a lot of rework on conversation scope handling. > > > > I would like to go for 1.6.x as base version because of it instead of > 1.5.1. > > > > Any objection? > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> > >
