Think we have enough G guys to avoid the cp but no issues bringing it in owb for now. Le 17 août 2015 03:18, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> The question now is whether we should svn cp the geronimo-jcdi-1.1 package > back to owb and maintain it here until it is reasonably stable (and then > svn mv it back to geronimo)? > Or should we keep it there and just create a new geronimo-jcdi-2.0 package > in geronimo-specs? > > Both is technically the same as we can svn cp back and forth without > loosing any history. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 17.08.2015 um 11:04 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]>: > > > > +2 lol > > > > Le lun. 17 août 2015 à 10:59, Arne Limburg < > [email protected]> > > a écrit : > > > >> +1 > >> I hope, I¹ll find some time to help > >> > >> > >> Am 11.08.15 15:05 schrieb "Romain Manni-Bucau" unter > >> <[email protected]>: > >> > >>> Cant guarantee to help a lot now but +1. Would be nice to not identify > >>> spec > >>> issues too late. > >>> Le 11 août 2015 05:31, "Gerhard Petracek" <[email protected]> > a > >>> écrit : > >>> > >>>> +1 > >>>> > >>>> regards, > >>>> gerhard > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 2015-08-11 13:58 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi folks! > >>>>> > >>>>> What about starting with implementing CDI-2.0? > >>>>> > >>>>> The spec is of course not finished but I¹d like to be a bit more > >>>> bleeding > >>>>> edge than last time ;) > >>>>> > >>>>> I¹ll start with copying over the geronimo-jcdi spec packages and > >>>> create a > >>>>> feature branch in our SVN. > >>>>> If you have some changes then feel free to ship some patches! > >>>>> > >>>>> LieGrue, > >>>>> strub > >>>> > >> > >> > >
