IMO it makes the build more readable and human friendly. That said why not just voting. Dont think we need to spend weeks on this topic. Le 27 oct. 2015 09:29, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> -1 for having <name> in poms at all. In practice it makes finding the > right submodule just too hard if you don’t know the project. And if you do > then you don’t need it anyway. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 26.10.2015 um 21:16 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected] > >: > > > > Guess it is subjective enough to not do a long thread on this. We just > need > > to avoid to change them each week ;). > > Le 26 oct. 2015 20:52, "Thomas Andraschko" <[email protected]> > a > > écrit : > > > >> Yep, you'r right but it still looks good in OWB -> > >> http://s2.postimg.org/a2b8x7e2x/asd.png > >> > >> > >> 2015-10-26 20:25 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: > >> > >>> Any separator works but it is nice to not just keep everything inlined > >>> without hierarchy marker for multi module projects. > >>> > >>> > >>> Romain Manni-Bucau > >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > >>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > >>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > >>> <http://www.tomitribe.com> > >>> > >>> 2015-10-26 20:20 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko < > >> [email protected] > >>>> : > >>> > >>>> oh, i see. > >>>> Doesn't matter for me, for me it's usual without "::" :) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 2015-10-26 20:11 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected] > >: > >>>> > >>>>> TomEE, Sirona, BatchEE, JCS, Johnzon, XBean to cite a few > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau > >>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > >>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > >>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > >>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > >>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com> > >>>>> > >>>>> 2015-10-26 19:56 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko < > >>>> [email protected] > >>>>>> : > >>>>> > >>>>>> yep, it's about mvn <name> :) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> +0 > >>>>>> Where is this pattern used? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 2015-10-26 19:41 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau < > >> [email protected] > >>>> : > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> If you speak about mvn <name> +1. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> BTW I like <project> [:: <module>]* pattern: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Apache OpenWebBeans > >>>>>>> Apache OpenWebBeans :: Core > >>>>>>> Apache OpenWebBeans :: Web > >>>>>>> Apache OpenWebBeans :: JSF 2.2 > >>>>>>> ... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau > >>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > >>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > >>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > >>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > >>>>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> 2015-10-26 19:36 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko < > >>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>> : > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> WDYT about unify the project names in the poms? > >>>>>>>> DeltaSpike and MyFaces always prepends "Apache" and the project > >>>> name. > >>>>>>>> e.g. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Apache MyFaces JSF2.2 Core API > >>>>>>>> Apache MyFaces JSF2.2 Core Impl > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Apache DeltaSpike Parent > >>>>>>>> Apache DeltaSpike Modules > >>>>>>>> ... > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> In OWB it's: > >>>>>>>> OpenWebBeans Core > >>>>>>>> Tomcat 7 Plugin > >>>>>>>> EL 2.2 Plugin > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> It's just a little bit annoying in the IDE... > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>>> Thomas > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >
