Le 19 déc. 2015 17:00, "Matt Benson" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > On Dec 19, 2015 9:54 AM, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Thought it was cause causing delegate init even in debug dtatement when > > context was not there. > > > > But not sure how to solve the "issue". > > I'm not familiar with the code, but it would seem that you could delegate > #toString() any time the proxy already exists. Getting back to the eager > initialization problem, would an additional introduced interface help? >
Another API no but we cant really know since the context is user dependent. > Matt > > > Le 19 déc. 2015 16:19, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > > > We had this in 1.1.x and I remember there was a reason why we removed > it. > > > Think it was either because it was slow or because spec/tck forced us. > Not > > > sure anymore. > > > You could grab through the changes in svn. > > > > > > LieGrue, > > > strub > > > > > > > > > > Am 19.12.2015 um 13:56 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > [email protected] > > > >: > > > > > > > > It is undefined AFAIK or ambiguous since we pass TCK anyway. > > > > Le 19 déc. 2015 13:42, "Thomas Andraschko" < > [email protected]> > > > a > > > > écrit : > > > > > > > >> Hi, > > > >> > > > >> shoudln't toString call the original toString method of the > contextual > > > >> instance? > > > >> > > > >> 2015-12-18 20:13 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau < [email protected] > >: > > > >> > > > >>> Hi guys, > > > >>> > > > >>> ATM we dont proxy methods in Objects (ie normalScope.toString()) > will > > > do > > > >> a > > > >>> toString on the proxy - see > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > org.apache.webbeans.proxy.SubclassProxyFactory#delegateNonInterceptedMethods. > > > >>> > > > >>> This is fine by itself but then how to enforce the eager init of a > bean > > > >> in > > > >>> a reliable manner? > > > >>> > > > >>> Side note: you probably all know the @CdiStartup extension relying > on > > > >>> toString() in after validation event callback and the code I used - > and > > > >>> which fails - was pretty close to that. > > > >>> > > > >>> FYI I tested only on 1.2.7 but code didnt change much in 1.2.x > branch I > > > >>> think. > > > >>> > > > >>> Any input/idea? > > > >>> > > > >>> Romain Manni-Bucau > > > >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > > >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > > >>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > > >>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > > > >>> <http://www.tomitribe.com> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > >
