+1 for 1.7 imo there is no need to stick with 1.6.x regards, gerhard
2016-01-31 16:42 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]>: > +1 for 1.7 > but as romain said, i'm also very sure this is rarely used by users. > > 2016-01-31 16:26 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: > > > +1 for what? staying with 1.6.x or moving to 1.7.x? > > > > txs and LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > Am 31.01.2016 um 13:06 schrieb Thomas Andraschko < > > [email protected]>: > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > 2016-01-31 12:59 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: > > > > > >> hi folks! > > >> > > >> While implementing OWB-1107 I had to introduce a subinterface of > > >> ScannerService called ‚BdaScannerService‘ > > >> While OWB deployer works find with both old ScannerService and new > > >> BdaScannerService SPI impls it might probably be better to indicate > the > > new > > >> SPI by moving the minor number? > > >> > > >> I personally can live with keeping 1.6.3 as next version. But I am > also > > >> fine with 1.7.x as we really introduced a few new things which are up > > for > > >> CDI-2.0 officially. > > >> > > >> Any thoughts? > > >> > > >> LieGrue, > > >> strub > > > > >
