hi, i would prefer an info which shows the final order (of interceptors,...) including skipped configs due to such a (valid) redundancy. -> with that we get an additional benefit (for users).
regards, gerhard 2016-07-08 12:27 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: > Hi guys > > today we issue a warning when duplicated interceptors are set up. > > Saw it with DS using beans.xml + @Priority on CDI 1.1 runtimes > > I wonder if it is ok to put it as an INFO? > > I'd like a startup to not have any log > INFO when all is fine and this > behavior is ok for the spec as said Gerhard. > > wdyt? > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> >
