Any way to keep existing released jar compatible without keeping the module
there? Saw some users still stucked to that :(


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
<https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>

2016-08-29 10:37 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>:

> fine with 1.7.0.
>
> But then let's also get rid of JSF-1.2 support ;)
>
> Any objections?
>
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Monday, 29 August 2016, 10:27, Thomas Andraschko <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > > +0
> > It's probably better to do a 1.7 instead 1.6.x release if we do this
> >
> >
> > 2016-08-29 10:18 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>:
> >
> >>  +0 (not sure it changes anything for us mid term but better to upgrade
> >>  since EOL are way overpassed)
> >>
> >>
> >>  Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>  @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> >>  <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog
> >>  <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
> >>  rmannibucau> |
> >>  LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> >>  <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
> >>  <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> >>
> >>  2016-08-29 10:16 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>:
> >>
> >>  > Hi!
> >>  >
> >>  > I'm in the progress to update quite a few plugins in the OWB
> > build.
> >>  > Most of them now require java7. And CDI-1.2 is also clearly EE7
> level.
> >>  > Which requires Java7.
> >>  >
> >>  > So I propose to upgrade trunk to Java7 as minimal requirement.
> >>  >
> >>  > Any objections?
> >>  >
> >>  > LieGrue,
> >>  > strub
> >>  >
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to