+1 - my applications are working fine 2016-09-01 10:50 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
> dont care much of digits but +1 to just move forward and not reuse failed > release numbers > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ > rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > 2016-09-01 10:47 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>: > > > 1.7.1 maybe. But we can easily kill 1.7.0 that from buildjob. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, 1 September 2016, 8:08, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Any way to not use 1.7.0? Repo(s) is already hosting it so no way to > > > validate it until we make INFRA evicting the binaries. > > > > > > Would 1.7.0.1 ok? > > > > > > > > > Le 31 août 2016 22:51, "Mark Struberg" > > > <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> a écrit : > > > > > >> New take for OWB-1.7.0 > > >> > > >> Repo is > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > >> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/ > > >> > > >> Source release is > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > >> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/org/apache/openwebbeans/ > openwebbeans/1.7.0/ > > >> > > >> You gonna find the rest I'm sure :) > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> [+1] let's ship it! > > >> [+0] meh, don't care > > >> [-1] nope, because ${blocker} > > >> > > >> > > >> The VOTE is open for 72h > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Here is my +1 > > >> > > >> txs and LieGrue, > > >> strub > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:23, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > >> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > 2016-08-31 22:18 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg > > > <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>: > > >> > > > >> >> No, it's really that we ditch the ThreadLocals in a place > > > where we > > >> >> shouldn't. > > >> >> > > >> >> TCK passes even after my fix. > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > Shouldn't since the start object is broken in the context control > > > - that > > >> > said we can move this over #deltaspike, doesn't affect OWB at all > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> LieGrue, > > >> >> strub > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:17, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > >> >> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> >> > > FYI CDI TCK are green on tomee project (embedded and > > > standalone) > > >> >> > > > >> >> > @Gerhard: if still the same issue related to session/request > > > scopes > > >> it > > >> >> is a > > >> >> > bug of CdiCtrl API more than an OWB one so can (should) be > > > fixed in > > >> >> > deltaspike not there (note that OpenWebBeansContextControl > > > doesn't > > >> >> respect > > >> >> > the spec and therefore cdictrl behavior doesn't work and > > > both > > >> > statements > > >> >> > are very compatible). > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Romain Manni-Bucau > > >> >> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > >> >> > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress > > > Blog > > >> >> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > > >> >> > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > >> >> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | > > > Tomitriber > > >> >> > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory > > >> >> > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > 2016-08-31 22:09 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek > > >> > <gpetra...@apache.org>: > > >> >> > > > >> >> >> -1, because it still breaks > > >> >> >> org.apache.deltaspike.cdise.tck.ContainerCtrlTckTest > > > (as soon as > > >> > owb > > >> >> is > > >> >> >> used with openejb). > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> regards, > > >> >> >> gerhard > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> 2016-08-30 10:40 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg > > >> > <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>: > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Good morning! > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache > > >> > OpenWebBeans-1.7.0. > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > The staging repo is: > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > >> >> >> > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/ > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > The source release can be found at > > >> >> >> > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > >> >> >> > > > > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/org/apache/openwebbeans/ > > >> >> openwebbeans/1.7.0/ > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > My Key can be found in > > >> >> >> > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > The tag in SVN is > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/ > > >> >> openwebbeans-1.7.0/ > > >> >> >> > Revision r1758342 > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > [+1] let's ship it! > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > [+0] meh, don't care > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > [-1] nope, because ${blocker} > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > The VOTE is open for 72h > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > txs and LieGrue, > > >> >> >> > strub > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >
