makes me think we should probably add to the doc a page about meecrowave
target. we played in the microprofile trend but we are not exactly coming
from there actually, wdyt?


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
<https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>

2017-01-09 14:16 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>:

> It was mostly discussed on the list and with committs starting with
> October or so.
>
> I also like to emphase that we have the tomcat integration since almost
> the beginning.
> We just missed the bundling. But this was really frequently asked for!
> So from this aspect it's just a small enhancement over what we already do
> since 2009.
>
> But since Tomcat and OWB has different release cycles it did not make
> sense to do it in the owb/trunk but it must get it's own independent
> release cycle. And thus a new SVN root (simply because of how Maven works).
>
> Regarding Incubator or not: Incubator is for new _external_ work. All the
> work of Meecrowave is done by OWB committers inside OWB. And again: it's
> not entirely new but just an enhancement over what we already provided
> since 2009.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 09.01.2017 um 09:26 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com
> >:
> >
> > Hi Gurkan,
> >
> > very good question ;)
> >
> > We actually debated more places - think half of the discussion was on IRC
> > but there was a thread there as well.
> >
> > Let me try to summurize it.
> >
> > First of all a quick reminder: meecrowave is first OWB+Tomcat+CXF (before
> > being microprofile which is just a buzz word today and doesn't mean more
> > than this). Said otherwise it is the core of any potential server today
> in
> > a smooth fashion (embeddable, presetup etc).
> >
> > Then in term of where to do it:
> >
> > - incubator: community will be OWB and/or Tomcat and/or CXF -> no point
> to
> > create a new project with the same community (we kind of get this as an
> > issue for several EE sub projects so we tried to avoid it)
> > - Tomcat: not their philosophy and goal to do more than tomcat scope
> > (JAX-RS and CDI are clearly out of their bounds)
> > - CXF: would be a good place but CDI stays core of meecrowave and not
> their
> > central knowledge yet
> > - TomEE: no real force there and TomEE has a few big pitfalls like being
> > associated with a full blown server which make most of its subprojects
> > eliminated before being evaluated even if not accurate
> > - OWB: Tomcat/OWB integration is a real plus for OWB, CXF is likely a "?"
> > but the CXF part is not that much in meecrowave, most of the code is
> > Tomcat/OWB integration and config
> >
> > We had the first discusiion on http://markmail.org/thread/
> vh6x3u7yt6ex2fp2
> > IIRC
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
> rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
> > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> >
> > 2017-01-09 9:11 GMT+01:00 Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com.
> invalid>:
> >
> >> Hi all
> >> First of all happy new year!
> >> As I am a founder and keen observer of the project (hope to commit much
> >> more time this year), I would like to ask a question regarding the new
> >> subproject Meecrowave. Why would we create such a sub-project under
> >> OpenWebBeans? From my perspective, OpenWebBeans only aim is to implement
> >> CDI specifications. If we would like to create a such a microprofile
> >> server, we may have to first write an incubator project proposal,
> >> http://incubator.apache.org/
> >> Moreover, I think that this subproject must be under developed in Apache
> >> TomEE, not in OpenWebBeans.
> >>
> >> Do we have any discussion about this topic in the dev or private list
> that
> >> I did not catch?
> >> Regards.
> >> Gurkan-
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to