https://docs.jboss.org/cdi/spec/1.2/cdi-spec.html#bean_defining_annotations
Lg, Strub > Am 23.07.2017 um 09:20 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > Can one of you list the part of the spec stating it for this thread to be > self contained please? > > Who takes the fix? Can have a look end of next week I guess if it helps. > > Le 22 juil. 2017 23:37, "Mark Struberg" <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> a > écrit : > >> John is right. interceptor and Decorator are bean defining annotations. >> >> John, can you plz file a ticket! >> >> Txs and LieGrue, >> Strub >> >>> Am 21.07.2017 um 21:37 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com >>> : >>> >>> Conflicts with annotated part i think. Priority doesnt enable a bean by >>> itself. >>> >>> Le 21 juil. 2017 21:31, "John D. Ament" <johndam...@apache.org> a écrit >> : >>> >>>> The interceptor is intended to be enabled just because of the @Priority >>>> annotation. Nothing else should be required. Please review 9.4 of the >>>> spec http://docs.jboss.org/cdi/spec/2.0/cdi-spec.html# >> enabled_interceptors >>>> >>>> John >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 3:22 PM Romain Manni-Bucau < >> rmannibu...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Misses @Dependent yes. >>>>> >>>>> Le 21 juil. 2017 19:35, "John D. Ament" <johndam...@apache.org> a >> écrit >>>> : >>>>> >>>>> I have an interceptor defined as: >>>>> >>>>> @Interceptor >>>>> @LoggedIn >>>>> @Priority(Interceptor.Priority.APPLICATION + 100) >>>>> public class LoggedInInterceptor { >>>>> >>>>> and a beans.xml with >>>>> >>>>> <beans version="1.1" bean-discovery-mode="annotated"/> >>>>> >>>>> This interceptor isn't being discovered. It is discovered when >> beans.xml >>>>> is an empty file. This same interceptor is discovered on OWB 1.7, but >>>> not >>>>> in 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT. >>>>> >>>>> John >>>>> >>>> >> >>
