That would be really great if you could create Tickets and attach patches, txs John
LieGrue, strub > Am 16.08.2017 um 01:25 schrieb John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > > A 2.0.1 based on the current would be good, however I would recommend > bringing in these two commits independent of the remaining work, since they > fix core issues. > > - OWB isn't firing a before destroyed event - > https://github.com/johnament/openwebbeans/commit/10d62fca523f60a88616b8828cf4efccd845fadc > - OWB isn't honoring javax.enterprise.inject.scan.implicit flags - > https://github.com/johnament/openwebbeans/commit/696e4ba168124ac089e98392bf65c09fe002749d > > If you want I can create tickets and attach specific patches to those > tickets. > > John > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 3:22 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1 for se in 2.0.2 and 2.0.1 sooner >> >> If you nees help for SE on something specific, feel free to ping me. >> >> Le 15 août 2017 14:37, "Mark Struberg" <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> a >> écrit : >> >>> Oki, that seems to be a bit more work to be left still. >>> >>> I'd then suggest to go on with the immanent features and release >> OWB-2.0.1 >>> pretty soon while targetting 2.0.2 for the SE work. >>> >>> txs and LieGrue, >>> strub >>> >>> >>>> Am 15.08.2017 um 13:48 schrieb John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: >>>> >>>> Mark, >>>> >>>> SE support is still a long ways from being done. Most of the issues >> are >>>> resolved, all of the remaining problems are related to OWB not honoring >>>> when the container's been shutdown. >>>> >>>> The good news, by removing the automatic starting of request context >> and >>>> properly shutting down app context in the SELifeCycle class, OWB is >>> finally >>>> marking the proxies as invalid, but it seems like we still need to add >> an >>>> isRunning check somewhere. >>>> >>>> John >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 7:19 AM Mark Struberg >> <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid >>>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi folks! >>>>> >>>>> I'd love to fix OWB-1209 and get Johns SE changes in. >>>>> I think we are then ready to roll a 2.0.1 release, isn't? >>>>> >>>>> John, I'll be available on IRC to coordinate and review your proposed >> SE >>>>> changes. >>>>> Of course we could also discuss it via IRC, but might be easier to >> give >>>>> that feedback via a shared hangout screen. >>>>> >>>>> LieGrue, >>>>> strub >>>>> . >>>>> >>> >>> >>
