On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:05 AM Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>
wrote:
> Hmm, if you have a class
>
> public class Bla {
> private @Inject Instance<Foo> myInstance;
> }
>
> then I'd asssume that the InjectionPoint.getType for myInstance would be
> Instance<Foo> and not Foo alone.
>
>
Agreed, simply trying to make sense of what the code's trying to do.
> > The problem is that Bean.getBeanClass() can never be null, by definition,
> > but also should not be used for type safe resolution (we actually had a
> > discussion about this on the EG list as I had the opposite belief).
>
> Yes, there was a discussion which never got finished...
>
> Weld guys assume that they can infere the proxy type of a bean just by
> getTypes().
> I don't believe that. Especially if @Typed is involved or if the real
> AnnotatedType got modified then it is definitely not possible.
> At least it's pretty expensive to detect. Would get my head around it
> again tbh.
>
> In OWB we introduced an own method getReturnType() in OwbBean.
> This get's evaluated and cached based on a few criteria.
> Most of the time it simply uses the getBeanClass() type.
>
> I'll have to dig deeper into your sample to understand what you wanted to
> do with it.
>
> Could you probably put your use case in an OWB unit test and ship it as
> patch?
>
> The only thing you have to do is to extend AbstractUnit test and then use:
> startcontainer(ClassX.class, ClassY.class, ...);
>
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> > Am 10.09.2017 um 22:54 schrieb John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm running some tests locally using OWB and Instance objects. I noticed
> > that when the injection point is Instance<Foo> and I attempt to get an
> > injectable reference to the InjectionPoint, I get a very odd value for
> > InjectionPoint.getType(). As far as I understand it, this value should
> be
> > the type being injected into, e.g. Foo in my case. What I actually get
> > back is the value of Bean.getBeanClass(). That makes very little sense.
> > As best as I can tell, the following code snippet is the cause:
> >
> > if (ParameterizedType.class.isInstance(type))
> > {
> > ParameterizedType parameterizedType =
> > ParameterizedType.class.cast(type);
> > if (parameterizedType.getRawType() == Instance.class)
> > {
> > Bean<InjectionPoint> bean =
> > creationalContextImpl.getBean();
> > return new InjectionPointDelegate(
> > injectionPoint,
> > bean.getBeanClass() != null ?
> > bean.getBeanClass() : parameterizedType.getActualTypeArguments()[0]);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > The problem is that Bean.getBeanClass() can never be null, by definition,
> > but also should not be used for type safe resolution (we actually had a
> > discussion about this on the EG list as I had the opposite belief). But
> I
> > do believe that the else value is in fact what should always be used, I
> > always should be getting the expected parameterized value.
> >
> > If you guys agree, I can submit a patch to fix this.
> >
> > John
>
>
> .
>
