Java8 131 ubuntu and mvn 3.5.2 or idea 2017.2.

Le 17 févr. 2018 20:12, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]> a écrit :

> and broke it again ;)
>
> NFORMATION: Setting the server's publish address to be /
> [20:09:15.645][INFO ][           main][ifecycle.WebContainerLifecycle]
> OpenWebBeans Container has started, it took [23] ms.
> [20:09:15.647][INFO ][           main][meecrowave.cxf.CxfCdiAutoSetup]
> REST Application: / -> org.apache.cxf.cdi.DefaultApplication
> [20:09:15.647][INFO ][           main][meecrowave.cxf.CxfCdiAutoSetup]
> Service URI: /MultipartTest  -> org.apache.meecrowave.
> MultipartTest$MultiEndpoint
> [20:09:15.647][INFO ][           main][meecrowave.cxf.CxfCdiAutoSetup]
> GET /MultipartTest/ ->      Map<String, Object> getBooks()
> [20:09:16.659][INFO ][           main][ifecycle.WebContainerLifecycle]
> OpenWebBeans Container was stopped for context path, []
> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.135 sec
> <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.meecrowave.MultipartTest
> configBinding(org.apache.meecrowave.MultipartTest)  Time elapsed: 1.135
> sec  <<< ERROR!
> java.lang.NullPointerException
>     at org.apache.meecrowave.MultipartTest.configBinding(
> MultipartTest.java:53)
>     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>     at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(
> FrameworkMethod.java:50)
>     at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(
> ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
>     at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(
> FrameworkMethod.java:47)
>     at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.
> evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
>     at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:325)
>     at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
>     at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
>     at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
>
>
> We need to figure out why your box is green.
> Which jdk do you use? and OS?
>
> Been here on MacBook + Java8-144 and Linux (Fedora27) also java8.
> Both broken..
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> On Saturday, 17 February 2018, 19:00:07 CET, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> pushed a fix reverting the revert ;)
>
> changes are
>
> 1. we take the classloader from the servlet context instead of the tccl ->
> should be noop but way more secured
> 2. if there is no default bus we set one, avoids the server one to ends up
> being a default classloader and leaking, we also reset it if we set it
>
> hope it should fix most of the issues
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
> rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-
> ee-8-high-performance>
>
> 2018-02-17 16:48 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>:
>
> > Can you share the 2 locking threads plz?
> >
> > Le 17 févr. 2018 16:41, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <[email protected]> a
> > écrit :
> >
> >> What do you run? Always green here :(
> >>
> >> Le 17 févr. 2018 11:51, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]> a
> >> écrit :
> >>
> >>> Yes, been deterministic. At my own box but also on Reinhards. Broken
> >>> 100% of all runs.
> >>>
> >>> LieGrue,
> >>> strub
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> > Am 17.02.2018 um 11:16 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >>> [email protected]>:
> >>> >
> >>> > Le 17 févr. 2018 10:09, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]>
> a
> >>> > écrit :
> >>> >
> >>> > In the test there are 2 classloaders involved.
> >>> > a.) the client side
> >>> > b.) the server (tomcat).
> >>> >
> >>> > with the setExtension using the current TCCL we kind of leak the
> >>> Tomcat CL
> >>> > into the client it seems.
> >>> > It blows up with the Tomcat ParallelWebAppClassloader already not
> being
> >>> > active anymore.
> >>> > And the location where this happens is on the client side
> >>> (transforming the
> >>> > attachment FROM jsonb to object).
> >>> >
> >>> > i've also seen random CL errors in our real world project in the last
> >>> week.
> >>> > Might have something to do as well...
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > In webapp case then cause in classpath mode it should be the same.
> >>> >
> >>> > Issue is more the client inherit from the default bus instead of
> using
> >>> its
> >>> > own bus but it always has been this way. Isnt it a side effect of
> >>> creating
> >>> > a classloader to run tests in parallel?
> >>> >
> >>> > Are you able to reproduce it deterministicly?
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > LieGrue,
> >>> > strub
> >>> >
> >>> >> Am 17.02.2018 um 09:41 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >>> [email protected]>:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Le 16 févr. 2018 22:07, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]>
> a
> >>> >> écrit :
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Hi Romain!
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Reinhard managed to reproduce the issue when running the latest MW
> >>> source
> >>> >> on his box.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> With git-bisect we figured it has to do with r1822816
> >>> >>
> >>> >> MeecrowaveBus
> >>> >> "simplifying MeecrowaveBus and enforcing the classloader to avoid to
> >>> rely
> >>> >> on resource in ServletController when unneeded"
> >>> >>
> >>> >> The main change is to move the TCCL resolution and calling
> >>> setExtension.
> >>> >> This seems to break the Tomcat ParallelWebAppClassLoader.
> >>> >> Rather it seems that the cleanup then is being performed on the
> tomcat
> >>> >> side, even if the server is already shut down.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I gonna revert this change for now to make all tests pass again.
> >>> >> But tbh I have no clue what setExtension does in detail so plz
> review
> >>> it.
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> This is the classloader usee by the cxf deployment everywhere. If
> not
> >>> det
> >>> >> it is trivial not have a broken setup during all the other loading
> and
> >>> >> deployment.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> How does it lock parallel loading? I cant reproduce it.
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> LieGrue,
> >>> >> strub & Reinhard
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> Am 16.02.2018 um 15:42 schrieb Mark Struberg
> >>> <[email protected]>:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> -DreuseForks=false indeed lets the problem go away.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Now we need to find out where this side effect is coming from.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> LieGrue,
> >>> >>> strub
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>> Am 16.02.2018 um 14:31 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> >>> :
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> Hi Mark, can't reproduce it but used a johnzon 1.1.6 created from
> >>> the
> >>> >>>> 1.1.7-SNAPSHOT since the tag is not pushed on asf yet. Not sure it
> >>> has
> >>> > an
> >>> >>>> impact or if it is the test order which is responsible of it.Maybe
> >>> try
> >>> >>>> forcing reuseFork=false in surefire to validate this hypothesis
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>> >>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> >>> >>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> >>> >>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
> >>> >> rmannibucau> |
> >>> >>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> >>> >>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-
> >>> >> ee-8-high-performance>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> 2018-02-16 13:56 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <
> [email protected]
> >>> >:
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>> no worries, we first have to fix a seemingly random test failure
> >>> in MW
> >>> >>>>> anyway
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> Tests in error:
> >>> >>>>> MultipartTest.configBinding:51 » ResponseProcessing Problem with
> >>> > reading
> >>> >>>>> the d...
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> happens only when this test is executed with all other tests.
> >>> >>>>> Wenn running the test alone all is green.
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> Anyone want's to take that up?
> >>> >>>>> I'm offline for the next few hours now.
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> LieGrue,
> >>> >>>>> strub
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>>> Am 16.02.2018 um 13:49 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >>> >> [email protected]
> >>> >>>>>> :
> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>> +1
> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>> Side note: can you ensure it is either not deployed or staging
> >>> repo
> >>> > are
> >>> >>>>> in
> >>> >>>>>> the pom to not break early consumers please?
> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>> Le 16 févr. 2018 13:19, "Mark Struberg" <
> [email protected]>
> >>> a
> >>> >>>>>> écrit :
> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>> will roll a MW release in the afternoon.
> >>> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>> Currently testing the updates to the staged versions.
> >>> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>> LieGrue,
> >>> >>>>>>> strub
> >>>
> >>>
>

Reply via email to