I'd need to do some tests. But think it's fine. LieGrue, strub
> Am 21.04.2018 um 18:48 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: > > Hi guys, > > do we want to switch our fastMatching flag on the 2.x? (think we cant on > 1.x) > > Rational is we would be spec compliant. I know it has some issue with the > old way to create producers without generics (or more exactly with a > wildcard) but it is not spec compliant too. > > I encounter that issue (of having the wrong default) writing an extension > where i register the exact types even for templates (Foo<X> would have > registered Foo<A>, Foo<B>, ... as needed) > > wdyt? > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
