Hi Romain! Anonymous classes can not be CDI beans because they always need a 'containing' class. The containing class is always a first param in the ct. Even if you don't see it. An anonymous class (or a lambda class) is a non-static inner class. So it cannot be a CDI bean.
So A$1 is NEVER a CDI bean. Liegrue, strub > Am 29.07.2018 um 17:05 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: > > Hi guys, > > Didn't find anything in the spec so wonder what we want to do @owb. Here is > the case: I have a class (let say A) with one (or more) anonymous classes. > It will lead to define A$1. Now assume A is @Vetoed, is A$1 @Vetoed too? > > In current impl it is not but I wonder if it shouldn't by "inheritance"? In > terms of behavior this is what we do but if $1 can't be loaded cause of a > missing dependency we will get this kind of line: > > *[AbstractMetaDataDiscovery] Ignoring class [org.test.A$1] because it could > not be loaded: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/foo/Bar* > > It is a bit misleading at the end in the logs but I'm not sure at all how > we want to enhance that and makes our logs cleaner for such cases. > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
