[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16881785#comment-16881785
]
Greg Wilkins commented on OWB-1293:
-----------------------------------
You are not selling it that well.... "beans are mostly doable", "unsure our
principal bean is decorable" etc.
If left to our own devices to implement it sounds like we'd end up with a sub
standard integration that was moderately complex and dependent on OWB security
APIs anyway? My preference is that OWB works on the OWB integration and that
we provide simple hooks to integrate with. Now if the result of that effort is
an integration that is best maintained within the Jetty project, I've got no
problem with that... but I doubt we can author it ourselves.
Also, looks like I have a bit more research to do. Currently our decorator
works for listeners, filters and servlets. But we have no integration points
for request/session/conversation/principal - so I need to find out what those
are? Any pointers? I'll also look into the cdi-se
> Update Jetty integration prior to Jetty-10 release
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OWB-1293
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1293
> Project: OpenWebBeans
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Interceptor and Decorators
> Reporter: Greg Wilkins
> Priority: Major
>
> The current jetty integration relies on exposing private jetty APIs so a
> jetty Decorator can be registered. This is fragile and requires different
> APIs for the upcoming jetty-10 release.
> Instead, Jetty is developing a mechanism where a object with a decorator
> signature can be set as a context attribute and it will be introspected and
> dynamically registered as a decorator without any API dependencies.
> This is currently being developed in
> [https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/pull/3838] and an integration with
> Weld is at [https://github.com/weld/core/pull/1926]
> Feedback is sought from the OpenWebBeans team on the approach and then we'd
> like to collaborate to make a similar integration.
>
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
