We need a release from master before I think then it sounds possible to me.

Side note: our jakarta artifacts run well with CDI SE/notEE 2.0
certification already but were only tested against javax TCK AFAIK.

Le ven. 5 juin 2020 à 15:40, Gurkan Erdogdu <cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com> a
écrit :

> OK I agree.
> Lets focus on improving the OWB.
> What is the latest status of TCK covering regarding latest Jakarta EE CDI
> specification?
> Also, as I remembered Mark created a branch for Jakarta EE API? Can we
> migrate those to master?
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 4:38 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I agree comments are important but they must not paraphrase the code,
> look
> > at the two first comments of this commit:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/commit/c2b07386e2bd9a702a4fab07696e1a0cdcb792c7#diff-75cef79164caacdbcadbd8e8bcc87c3eR48
> > .
> > I learn that the construct constructs and the init method intiializes,
> not
> > sure it is worth the 6 lines.
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > <
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > >
> >
> >
> > Le ven. 5 juin 2020 à 15:30, Gurkan Erdogdu <cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com> a
> > écrit :
> >
> > > I again totally agree with you but think about the others. For
> example, I
> > > may not be clever to understand what the code is doing without any
> > comment.
> > > For me, comments are as important as source code.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 4:26 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > About classloader proxy:
> > > >
> > > > suspect I can need a more precise request - sadly I wrote this class
> > so I
> > > > understand it :s.
> > > > But the only thing in this whole class is putting a proxy class in a
> > map
> > > in
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/blob/master/webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/service/ClassLoaderProxyService.java#L135
> > > > .
> > > > Not sure we need a comment thanks to the class name, or does the name
> > > miss
> > > > "ClassDefiningService" explicitly?
> > > >
> > > > About spring: I hate this kind of codebase, you take way more time to
> > try
> > > > to read the comment than the code source and I never got luck I
> assume
> > > > cause when I spend 5mn on the doc I always end up reading the code
> > which
> > > > takes way less time. Writing so much javadoc makes sense when you use
> > the
> > > > code as an API - our SPI is into this category and we should explain
> > the
> > > > expectations and requirements - but impl is not in that category at
> > all.
> > > If
> > > > an user uses owb-impl in his project there is an issue. Since we
> don't
> > > > publish our impl modules javadoc I think it is saner to keep the
> > comments
> > > > for not obvious explanations - for ex
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/blob/master/webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/config/BeansDeployer.java#L1424
> > > > .
> > > >
> > > > Hope it explains a bit where I'm coming from and what I'm hoping we
> > > target.
> > > >
> > > > Le ven. 5 juin 2020 à 15:21, Gurkan Erdogdu <
> cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com>
> > a
> > > > écrit :
> > > >
> > > > > Also, for how to write comments, please look at Spring or
> SpringBoot
> > > code
> > > > > base.
> > > > > Just an example file :
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/blob/master/spring-beans/src/main/java/org/springframework/beans/BeanUtils.java
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 4:09 PM Gurkan Erdogdu <
> > > cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Look at
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/blob/master/webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/service/ClassLoaderProxyService.java
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 12:46 PM Mark Struberg
> > > > <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid
> > > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> We intentionally removed comments which do not add any value.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Just check the history. We deleted many @inheritdoc without any
> > > > > >> additional information.
> > > > > >> Or JavaDoc like /** sets the blablub */ for setBlablub();
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> It just adds useless lines of code and results in 30% more code
> > one
> > > > has
> > > > > >> to parse when reading it.
> > > > > >> Of course, javadoc which describes WHY and HOW we do it is
> highly
> > > > > welcome!
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Back in the early 2000 there have been metrics for code which
> > misses
> > > > > >> JavaDocs. This mantra is refuted since a long time.
> > > > > >> I'm sure there are plenty of other tasks which make perfect
> sense.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> LieGrue,
> > > > > >> strub
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > Am 05.06.2020 um 10:48 schrieb Gurkan Erdogdu <
> > > > > cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com
> > > > > >> >:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Hi folks
> > > > > >> > I am reviewing the source code, but there are codes without
> > > comments
> > > > > in
> > > > > >> > many places. Please can you review the codes and write
> > comments?I
> > > > know
> > > > > >> this
> > > > > >> > is boring, but commenting is very important. Otherwise, it is
> > not
> > > > > >> possible
> > > > > >> > to understand what is going on in your code.
> > > > > >> > Regards.
> > > > > >> > Gurkan
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Gurkan Erdogdu
> > > > > > http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Gurkan Erdogdu
> > > > > http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Gurkan Erdogdu
> > > http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Gurkan Erdogdu
> http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
>

Reply via email to