I really prefer to make the spec the default behavior, nobody expects a JAR
to be scanned without having a beans.xml but a extension
normally if you would like to use CDI, but avoid scanning, you add a CDI
extension but no beans.xml, thats exactly like MF and Mojarra is implemented

Lets wait for other opinions :)


Am Mi., 22. Sept. 2021 um 11:08 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
rmannibu...@gmail.com>:

> Think we should prefer our users over the spec for that so I'd be to
> support it with a toggle to enable it
> (org.apache.webbeans.skipJarWithExtensionScanning=false by default).
> If needed we can add a bdascannerservice with it at true (WebSpecScanner).
> And in 2.1 we can change it
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
>
>
> Le mer. 22 sept. 2021 à 11:06, Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I discussed with Romain about OWB-1298.
> >
> > Mojarra has NO beans.xml but a CDI Extension, which currently breaks OWB
> > as:
> > - WebsocketUserManager is scanned
> > - WebsocketUserManager is added in the extension
> >
> > in the specs (12.1) its defined, that:
> >
> > An archive which:
> >
> >    -
> >
> >    contains a beans.xml file with the bean-discovery-mode of none, or,
> >    -
> >
> >    contains an extension and no beans.xml file
> >
> > is NOT a bean archive.
> >
> >
> > Which means that OWB should NOT scan Mojarra and therefore users can use
> > Mojarra with OWB, without adding it to the scan exclusions or setting
> other
> > properties.
> >
> > If MyFaces wouldnt be in the default exclusions, it would also break MF
> and
> > maybe other libs.
> >
> > We should fix it and make it the default behavior.
> >
> > It should even improve startup as we skip more archives per default.
> >
> > Romain mentioned that there could be cases, where it could break apps. So
> > we should maybe introduce a new config property to enable the old
> behavior
> > again, which also scans archives with extensions but without beans.xml
> >
> > this is also related to org.apache.webbeans.scanBeansXmlOnly
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Thomas
> >
>

Reply via email to