I have an issue with OWB in TomEE under JDK 17
I think I can workaround it, but I'd need a small change in OWB.

Can we reroll it after my fix?

Le lun. 4 oct. 2021 à 09:29, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> a
écrit :

> +1
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 03/10/2021 20:56, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We fixed a few issues:
> >
> > PTKeySummaryAssigneeStatus
> > [image: Major] [image: Bug] OWB-1298
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1298> WebsocketUserManager
> > ambigious resolution Jakarta Faces
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1298> Unassigned RESOLVED
> > [image: Major] [image: Bug] OWB-1387
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1387>
> > @Destroyed(ApplicationScoped.class)
> > not thrown when @Destroyed(RequestScoped.class) exists
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1387> Arne Limburg
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=arne>
> CLOSED
> > [image: Major] [image: Improvement] OWB-1389
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1389> Remove destroyed
> instance
> > from memory <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1389> Mark
> Struberg
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=struberg>
> > RESOLVED
> > [image: Major] [image: Task] OWB-1390
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1390> support
> > javax.enterprise.inject.scan.implicit property
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1390> Romain Manni-Bucau
> > <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> >
> > RESOLVED
> > [image: Major] [image: Task] OWB-1391
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1391>
> AbstractMetaDataDiscovery
> > ignores classpath entries starting with a common path
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1391> Romain Manni-Bucau
> > <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> >
> > RESOLVED
> >
> > I know Thomas can await a few of them so wonder if we should trigger a
> > release next week (starting on the 4th) or in the following days.
> >
> > I'd just like to highlight the 1391 changes the way we ignore duplicated
> > jars/folders in in the classpath so can be worth some testing.
> >
> > No issue to delay from some days the release if it helps.
> >
> > Side note for our beloved tomee siblings: this shouldn't impact you since
> > you don't reuse that scanning/lifecycle logic so should be a "noop
> release"
> > for you.
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
> >
>


-- 
Jean-Louis

Reply via email to