Looks like we’ve set the Java version to 17. I can confirm it does build fine with 11.
Are we open to using 11 for 4.0.0 and waiting till the next release to go to 17? -David > On Jan 30, 2023, at 5:40 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.INVALID> wrote: > > hi folks! > > We are up and running with passing most CDI-4.0 TCK tests. > There are a few areas where we have excluded some tests: > > * CDI-lite. I'll not gonna implement this in OWB as it is purely for Quarkus > and I don't care. It should be straight forward to implement the > functionality as OWB plugin if someone really needs it though. > * Some challenged tests, some unspecified behaviour in some tests. E.g. they > assume a specified order class annotations before method annotations for > Interceptors. But the spec *explicitly* says that for Interceptors with the > same @Priority the order is unspecified. > * backward incompatible reversing the default bean-discovery-mode for empty > beans.xmls. I'll not gonna implement this as it also did break the JakartaEE > rules alltogether. > > > Things I want to change yet before the release: > > * Decide about the jetty9 plugin. Tbh I'd keep it excluded until someone > wants to contribute fixes to it. > * provide a shaded version of the CDI api jar without all the CDI-lite parts. > > > Wdyt? > > LieGrue, > strub > >
