For files (github) do we add Apache (C) 2017 alongside existing (IBM?) if we updated the contents?
Kind regards, Matt From: Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: 01/24/2017 01:35 PM Subject: Re: CWIKI some questions I think we can discuss that on dev. Moving private to bcc Hi Matt Login: for some reason, anonymous was not granted read access, so login was forced. Fixed. Titel: the URL comes from the wiki page title. If you change the title to 'OpenWhisk Home', the URL changes accordingly. Content: good question. Wiki write access in general will be more open, than site write access, which should be limited to committers. So the wiki contents is more community, nitty-gritty piece content. But I don't think there is a hard rule ... lets discuss discuss. Index: what kind of index ? The wiki already is two column with the left one with links and the page tree. That left column is resizable and hideable. It might be hidden in your browser if you don't see it. Promote: Yeah, linking to it from the site makes sense. Probably just like we link to other channels such as slack. Copyright: If it is IBMs desire to keep the copyright notes on existing pages, I think we can live with that. But for new content I suggest to just omit. If copyright is important it exist by virtue of it being written. IIRC an explicit statement is not technically required. Regards Felix Von meinem iPad gesendet Am 24.01.2017 um 17:00 schrieb Matt Rutkowski <[email protected]< mailto:[email protected]>>: I have been trying to start filling out some basic info. in our new CWIKI: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENWHISK/OpenWhisk+Project+Wiki and have a few questions that came as a result... 1) Will these pages ever be public, or will they always require a "signup"? 2) What contents should we add, suggestions? 3) Do I need to change to 2-column layout to achieve an index (left side)? 4) Where should we promote its use? (org site?, others?) related (as I was looking for cross-info on our .org site)... I see the copyright for the existing content is IBM 2016, which may be appropriate since the content was donated (and created by IBM in that year). a) Should this be changed to include Apache (2016) in any way? b) going forward what/how do we add the ASF copyright for 2017 (alongside) IBM or previous copyrights? PS: at some point the Wiki URL was changed to use "Project+Wiki" (and remove "Home"), was their a rationale? was this to conform to Apache conventions? Kind regards, Matt
