Thanks Felix, I have pull requests attached here for review: https://github.com/openwhisk/openwhisk-playground/pulls
Cheers Priti On 2017-02-10 10:26 (-0800), Felix Meschberger <fmesc...@adobe.com> wrote: > Hi Priti > > This sounds interesting, indeed. > > Unfortunately it seems that your URLs point to a restricted/private > repository which is not readily accessible. > > I suggest you create an issue for the appropriate openwhisk repository, > probably https://github.com/openwhisk/openwhisk-playground and attach a > pull-request. Important is that the JS files have the Apache-required license > header. > > Regards > Felix > > > Am 09.02.2017 um 11:08 schrieb Priti Desai > <pde...@us.ibm.com<mailto:pde...@us.ibm.com>>: > > > Hi, > > I was working on some functions that uses OpenWhisk and had an idea to add > it as a package. Here is its description: > > This package is about demonstrating how OpenWhisk project developers are > using OpenWhisk functions to > improve its own Continuous Development and Integration (CD/CI) processes. > OpenWhisk development and code commits are managed by Pull Requests in > GitHub. OpenWhisk team at IBM has implemented set of functions to receive > updates on Slack when a GitHub Pull Request is ready to merge or a list of > requests are under review for certain days and havenât merged. > > Please grant your permission to create a new package and commit the list of > files from: > > https://github.ibm.com/bjustin/OWGitSlackBot/blob/master/find_delayed_prs.js > https://github.ibm.com/bjustin/OWGitSlackBot/blob/master/monitor.js > https://github.ibm.com/bjustin/OWGitSlackBot/blob/master/post_to_slack.js > > Cheers > Priti > >
