Matt I can whitelist any other domain that we want - Carlos Santana @csantanapr
> On Mar 8, 2017, at 12:21 PM, Matt Rutkowski <mrutk...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > This came up early on when I saw that another project had white listed > domains. However, it appears that this is only available for "enterprise > accounts according to Slack: > > https://get.slack.help/hc/en-us/articles/115001379947-Domain-whitelisting > > Carlos as the admin. for the current Slack Team should be able to confirm > if he has the admin power to do this or not. > > > Here is a copy of text from an early email I sent to one or more mentors, > but do not recall the response other than my takeaway that "the community > can decide on how to use/leverage for social mediums/channels as long as > we defer to Apache email lists for serious topic discussions": > > ----- > > Many of our developers are reliant upon Slack communications, in the open > this is primarily under the dwOpen Team (especially for API Gateway work). > > As we want to try to move over existing message-based team communication > to the Apache community, we wish to preserve Slack as a mainstream > utility. How do we do this? > > I see that there is a precedent for the Mesos project to have a Slack > domain: > http://mesos.apache.org/community/ > > specifically: https://mesos.slack.com/ > > This site leverages existing User IDs from @apache.org, @ibm.com, etc. The > > text in the login screen includes the following: > > "If you have an @apache.org, @ibm.com, @cn.ibm.com, @us.ibm.com, > @apple.com, @mesosphere.com, @mesosphere.io, @microsoft.com, @uber.com, > @nvidia.com, @projectcalico.org, @metaswitch.com, @emc.com or > @mojotech.com email address, you can create an account." > > How do we go about setting something up like this for OpenWhisk with these > > additional domain-based account requirements? > > ------ > > So again, if we need an Enterprise account, how do we obtain (pay for) one > according to Apache? > > Kind regards, > Matt Rutkowski > > > > > > From: Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org> > To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org > Date: 03/08/2017 10:16 AM > Subject: Re: white-listing @apache.org for slack > > > > Any news on this? Who administers the Slack? > > If the process is not that quick, then maybe we should follows Felix's > idea > of opening up the registration to everybody ;-) > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> I would say it's fine to have some domains whitelisted, >> particular @apache,org ;-) >> >> But them at least we may add some instruction at >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENWHISK/Ope >> nWhisk+project+Slack+channels how to get invited from other domains. >> >> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Felix Meschberger <fmesc...@adobe.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> Should the openwhisk-team slack not just be open to anybody ? >>> >>> Or do we really need invites for all people unless whitelisted ? >>> >>> Regards >>> Felix >>> >>>> Am 07.03.2017 um 10:57 schrieb Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org>: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> try to get access to the podling slack, I've realized apache.org >>> addresses >>>> are not white-listed there: >>>> >>>> https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/signup >>>> >>>> Can any admin add it? >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sergio Fernández >>>> Partner Technology Manager >>>> Redlink GmbH >>>> m: +43 6602747925 >>>> e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co >>>> w: http://redlink.co >>> >>> -- >>> <http://redlink.co> >>> <http://redlink.co> >>> Sergio Fernández >>> Partner Technology Manager >>> Redlink GmbH >>> m: +43 6602747925 >>> e: <http://redlink.co>sergio.fernan...@redlink.co >>> w: http://redlink.co >>> >> > > > -- > Sergio Fernández > Partner Technology Manager > Redlink GmbH > m: +43 6602747925 > e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co > w: http://redlink.co > > > >
