Thanks for the info. I will definitely check it.

Regards

jugaadi :-)

On 19 April 2017 at 08:34, Dascalita Dragos <ddrag...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Jugaadi,
> This is a good idea. There is already a Kong Plugin for OpenWhisk - [1];
> it's limited in functionality when compared with the current Openwhisk
> Gateway - [2] . But the community could enhance the Kong plugin and it can
> be used by people who are already familiar with Kong. The current design in
> Openwhisk supports this "bring your own gateway" concept.
>
> Thanks,
> Dragos
>
> [1] - https://github.com/Mashape/kong-plugin-openwhisk
> [2] - https://github.com/openwhisk/openwhisk-apigateway
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 6:50 PM Jugaadi Da <bibin.abraham....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Team,
> >
> > I was wondering whether you have considered integrating with Kong as API
> > gateway for Openwhisk. The experimental project(Openwhisk API gateway)
> for
> > the same purpose is created along the same architecture as Kong. Kong
> being
> > a mature project and with support for excellent middleware
> functionalities
> > and clustering capabilities, would be a good candidate for this job. The
> > 3rd party  plugins ecosystem is also highly beneficial. Do let me know
> your
> > thoughts on this.
> >
> > Thanks and Regards
> >
> > ​jugaadi
> >  :-)
> >
>

Reply via email to