Thanks, Matt. a) #2: I agree, that one was/is redundant - even if we add a submission form later it would be send to the private list. Will remove it. #3: Fine with me; good to have at least someone feeling responsible once I am out ;) #4: For medium articles that may be fine, but tweets are usually time-critical and lose their value if you hold them back; that is why I would agree for everything except tweets where I would auto-approve if I or my backup is fine (can be deleted again worst case). #5 will be added in addition to what Bertrand already suggested prior. c)-e) Perfect. sth=something ;) f) What do we do with this one now? I am going to document this process (wiki) next week when I am back from traveling. Thanks.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards Dr. Andreas Nauerz Technical Product Manager | Master Inventor | Member TEC Central Region IBM Cloud, Bluemix Phone: +49-7034-643-2954 IBM Deutschland E-Mail: [email protected] Schoenaicher Str. 220 71032 Boeblingen Germany IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH / Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Köderitz Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294 From: "Matt Rutkowski" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: 14/06/2017 16:33 Subject: Re: How to continue to use our social media channels Hi Andreas, > a) Is the process outlined above okay for all of you?> The process sounds well thought out. thoughts/comments below... #2 seems redundant since the request will go to the "private" list (which includes all PPMC members); were you thinking special attention was needed beyond this? Perhaps this means one of the PPMC members acknowledges and speaks in for/against, calls for discussion (and perhaps a vote later if needed). #3 I would be happy to be a designated "backup", but all PPMC should effectively be tertiary backups ) #4 I think that if the checklist is satisfied by one of the reviewers for a submission, they could send an email to "private" (i.e., PPMC) indicated "looks good, going to approve/post in X (24) hours if no one objects and we need to further discuss and (if not resolved) call a vote? add of course #5 If PPMC cannot agree, seek advice from the Apache Incubator PMC (and perhaps Apache legal/trademark where we would likely be sent if it comes to this). > c) Who wants to help with implementing the submission form?> I can try to help; would be fun to see the insides of the website repo. having built and deployed it locally only to update some esoteric layouts/css. > d) Who wants to act as a backup while I am out?> o/ (raises hand) > e) Is the idea of using our private mailing list as temp solution fine > It is what happens anyway now (without a FORM and its structured fields). So fine by me... in fact, we would need to consider the FORM supporting attachments or have the submitter supply a link to some doc store. > (can anyone send sth to this?)?> was afraid to ask, but what is "sth" ( Stash file type?)? > f) What do we want to use to share credentials? SVN, Lastpass, sth else?> I think that is for the PPMC to discuss? - Matt
