Hi Rob,

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Rob Allen <[email protected]> wrote:
> ...The really nice thing about a good asynchronous mode is that you end up 
> with a searchable
> history for each conversation, ideally where the start of each conversation 
> can be easily found
> and contributed to....

Yes, that's the spirit of the Apache "if it didn't happen on the dev
list, it didn't happen" mantra.

However that doesn't mean every discussion needs to fully happen on
the mailing list. As you mention, mailing lists are an old an clunky
tool, I think they can work very well for complex discussions but that
requires a lot of discipline (in quoting, threading etc) which more
modern tools don't require.

What's required however is that someone can follow the action by
*just* subscribing to this dev list: be aware of what's going on, be
informed of where details are discussed if not here, and review and
understand technical decisions in asynchronous mode, without having to
watch hours of recording or read volumes of chat logs.

> ...Mainly I'm letting everyone know that I'm not very active here as I find 
> it hard to be. I
> appreciate that the email list is long-term stable, but it is intimidating 
> and can be a barrier
> for people who are used to web-based asynchronous systems such as issue 
> trackers,
> PRs or forums...

IMO the key is in finding the right way to combine those tools to
create the "asynchronous collaboration bus" that enables Apache-style
projects. Having a complex discussion in a pull request or tracker
ticket is fine, but if it's non-trivial it needs to be reflected here,
even if that's just "hey we are having a discussion about FOO in
ticket OW-1234, plaese join if you're interested" so that someone
who's just paying attention to the dev list doesn't miss anything.

So like Felix I'm worried about (a lot of) OpenWhisk technical
discussions not being reflected here, and I think this needs to change
as the project moves towards graduation. Tools are evolving and that's
great, but the principles remain.

-Bertrand

Reply via email to