Hi Michael I got the list by going over every repo recently and reviewing latest state. Which for the most part I follow all changes, PR, issues to every OpenWhisk repo :-)
What do you think if we add a column to the Repo Status Wiki page? https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENWHISK/GitHub+Repository+Status --Carlos On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 1:14 PM Michael Marth <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Carlos, > > Thanks for sharing that! > Slide 4 made me wonder on the distinction between “maintained” repos and > “experimental” repos. I totally agree that this distinction exists in > practice, but I wondered how you got to the list. And I should add: I don’t > dispute the repos you put on the “experimental” list. My question was > whether the list of experimental repos is common knowledge (and if not: how > we can make it so) > > Cheers > Michael > > On 07/12/17 04:57, "Carlos Santana" <[email protected]> wrote: > > This week I gave a talk internal in IBM to illustrate the work recently > done in braking openwhisk components into multiple repositories, and > how we > integrate them in our downstream deployment. > > Some slides I think are useful to share with the community it gives a > map > where are components located. > > Also shows how the CLI code was finally migrated to it's own repo, and > manual synchronization stopped. > > I uploaded the slides to the wiki [1] > > Let me know if the link works and you are able to download. > > There is also an old issue [2] I just closed that contains one of the > main > slides. > > [1] > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/74689638/Whisk-Component-Repos-Public.pdf?api=v2 > [2] https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/422 > > -- Carlos > > >
