This is great. The use of python as the proxy was a historical convenience. 
Your changes are shaping up nicely; thanks for pushing it forward. 

-r

> On Feb 22, 2018, at 6:08 AM, Michele Sciabarra <openwh...@sciabarra.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> After spending a session of learning way more swift I ever wanted to know, I 
> hacked an horrible sample of Swift code implementing the Hello World as a 
> read-stdin-write-std-out loop.
> 
> The code in all his ugliness I do not dare to post is here:
> 
> https://github.com/sciabarracom/openwhisk-runtime-go/blob/pipe-loop/HelloSwift/Sources/Hello/main.swift
> 
> However I used this example to to compare my new implementation in Go with 
> the current one (as described in James Thomas blog post 
> http://jamesthom.as/blog/2017/06/28/serverless-swift-with-openwhisk/) and 
> this is the result:
> 
> +----------+-------+------+------+------+------+------+-----+------+
> |  Label   |   #   | Avg  | Med  | 90%  | 95%  | 99%  | Min | Max  |
> +----------+-------+------+------+------+------+------+-----+------+
> | Current  | 10000 | 1097 | 1101 | 1169 | 1191 | 1243 |  19 | 2132 |
> | Go+Swift | 10000 |    4 |    4 |    6 |    6 |   10 |   2 | 1030 |
> | TOTAL    | 20000 |  551 |   66 | 1148 | 1169 | 1221 |   2 | 2132 |
> +----------+-------+------+------+------+------+------+-----+------+
> 
> To be honest I am not sure why. As far as I know, Swift support  is 
> implemented as a read-write loop too (or at least this is what looks like to 
> a quick look to the code), however python is not famous to be a performing 
> language (and I suspect the Global Interpreter Lock may play a role in those 
> numbers).
> 
> I did also a comparison of Go and Swift running under my new implementation. 
> Implemented in this way , the are basically the same speed.  
> 
> However it is worth to be noted that the image for Golang only is 10MB, but 
> if I have to add swift support you need a lot of libraries on it. I used a 
> docker image based on ibmcom/ubuntu-swift but it is huge (1.8G!), I think a 
> trimmed down version is needed.
> 
> All the code is in my repo in the pipe-loop branch. Now I think I will have 
> to take the time to clean up the code and make it robust.
> 
> 
> -- 
>  Michele Sciabarra
>  openwh...@sciabarra.com

Reply via email to