Hi Carlos, Re the 1.0.0 in "1.0.0-incubating" below: I cannot recall a discussion on the actual version number for the first release (sorry, in case I missed it). I wonder whether we intend to follow SemVer. If yes, then releasing as 1.0 would mean we would not change the external APIs in an incompatible way (unless we go to 2.0, etc). Is this the common understanding?
Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this Michael On 15/03/18 12:17, "Carlos Santana" <[email protected]> wrote: Yes I agree Bertram 100% I have being following the Github issues and PRs in the issues and commits mailing lists No other discussions are going about release other than what’s in the release repo that Vincent and Daisy are attacking and the discussions that both are bringing to the dev mailing list. And yes I agree I think we are very close on automation to start kicking out our first 1.0.0-incubating RC1 :-) - Carlos Santana @csantanapr > On Mar 15, 2018, at 7:07 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > AFAICS releases have been discussed in your calls, with my incubation > mentor hat on I'd like to stress the importance of discussing those > here or at least exposing pointers to discussions here if they are > happening somewhere else, like in issue tracker tickets. > > I am consciously not following the Slack discussions as these are > meant to be throwaway and important stuff needs to be discussed here. > I suppose other mentors do the same so bringing these discussions here > will help gather feedback early and often to help OpenWhisk do good > Apache releases soon! > > Using a [mentors] subject line header is a good way to raise the > mentors attention when needed. > > HTH, > -Bertrand
