Good progress Vincent I reviewed the tutorial with steps for doing the release and opened an issue [1] to update the document that there needs to be a second vote on incubator list, which is the one that would provide the final set of votes to release.
Bertrand. >Are those tools ready for the PPMC to start preparing the first release of a significant OpenWhisk module? I think we almost ready, Only thing I think there are a set of source files that are missing the Apache License header. Other than this I think we should be ready to cut the first RC and start vote on dev list. [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/72 -- Carlos On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 7:16 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:40 PM, Vincent S Hou <[email protected]> wrote: > > ...Our tool to manage the release process of OpenWhisk is currently on > track > > and open to any tests and comments.... > > As an incubation mentor I'm not necessarily interested in all the > details of the release tools, but more on the overall release process > and artifacts. > > Are those tools ready for the PPMC to start preparing the first > release of a significant OpenWhisk module? > > If yes I think that's the best way of validating them and the > understanding of the release process by the PPMC. > > The way it works is that a release candidate is voted upon here before > moving to the Incubator PMC vote which is required to authorize the > release. > > So having imperfect release candidates is not a problem, they can be > discussed and improved here without bothering the Incubator PMC. > > -Bertrand >
