I vote: +1 Release as Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating Checklist for reference: [ X ] Download links are valid. [ X ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. [ X ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. [ X ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repo. [ X ] All files have license headers if necessary. (assuming I ran scancode correctly...see below). [ X ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
In regard to Dave's comments: > (2) I think it would be better to include the exact commands for running > scancode to verify that all files have license headers instead of > referencing the scancode tutorial. For example, I am not 100% positive if > by following the tutorial (see shell transcript below) really checked the > right rules or if I needed to invoke scancode with a specific configuration > file. The release repo. actually informs on how compliance checks are automated and references the configuration files used: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/blob/master/docs/license_compliance.md#scancode
