Thank you, Bertrand. The page has been updated. Best wishes. Vincent Hou (侯胜博)
Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM Cloud Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: [email protected], Phone: +1(919)254-7182 Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United States -----Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> wrote: ----- To: [email protected] From: Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> Date: 10/09/2018 08:01AM Subject: Re: Instruction documented to release openwhisk projects under apache Hi, (replying to dev@ only, no need for a private conversation here) On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 9:49 PM Vincent S Hou <[email protected]> wrote: > ...I have documented the instruction to release openwhisk module under Apache > as release manager at > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENWHISK/How+to+release+OpenWhisk+under+Apache+as+incubator+project > .. thank you! I have one comment on the voting, there are no vetoes in Apache release votes, as per https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html vetoes only apply to code changes. So I suggest changing the "Go through the voting process" section to say *** ...both parties to pass the vote, as per https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html * the vote email needs to be open for at least 72 hours; * at least 3 positive votes are received from the binding members, which means PPMC members in OpenWhisk community and IPMC members in Apache; * there are more positive than negative binding votes; * once at least 72 hours have passed, the vote is tallied in a [VOTE][RESULT] message. *** I don't seem to have karma to make those changes myself on that wiki page. Of course, negative votes should be taken into account if possible, even if non-binding. But that's not a formal requirement - we think it's more important for the project to be able to move forward if that's what a majority of voters wants. -Bertrand
