Thanks for sharing Dominic. I'll need to read this slowly to understand it. It does look like a bit of the proposal you've discussed in the past with 1 topic per action name (per namespace). Have you seen this scale in your production to thousands of topics?
-r On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 5:59 AM Dominic Kim <style9...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear whiskers. > > I`ve just submitted the proposal for the next version of Autonomous > Container Scheduler. > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENWHISK/Autonomous+Container+Scheduler+v2 > > We(Naver), already implemented the scheduler based on that proposal and > it's almost finished. > It's not all-round scheduler but we could observe many performance benefits > in a few cases. > > We(Naver) are willing to contribute it and preparing for the contribution. > I hope the proposal would help you guys understand the implementation. > > To contribute the scheduler, it is required to contribute SPI for > ContainerPool and ContainerProxy first. > I will start working on this. > And I will describe the details about each component in each subpage. > Currently, they are blank. > > Please be noted again that the scheduler is not for all cases. > But it would be useful in many cases until new implementation based on the > future architecture of OW would be landed. > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENWHISK/OpenWhisk+future+architecture?src=contextnavpagetreemode > > Any comments and feedback would be very grateful. > > Thanks > Regards > Dominic >
