This is super awesome Michele +1
- Carlos Santana @csantanapr > On Dec 9, 2018, at 1:14 PM, Michele Sciabarra <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello Whiskers, > > without any further ado here is the report with a nice html graph. > > https://sciabarracom.github.io/incubator-openwhisk-runtime-actionloop/ > > Test Methodology: I wrote a "multipost" Go application able to run multiple > init and run in sequence and I measured the execution time with the unix > "time" utility. I tested runs executing one init and 1000 runs in sequence. I > tested init starting 100 containers in different ports then executing 100 > init AND run in sequence on the various containers. > > A few notes. > > I tested go and swift both precompiled (main_go.zip and main_swift.zip) and > with a compilation on-the-fly. Go init time looks slower than swift, but the > Go is statically compiled and it is huge, while the swift is dynamically > compiled and it is small. I believe most of the time is spent uploading and > unpacking the zip. I should consider creating dynamically linked go > execution. > > Python runtimes are slow, and this is not a surprise, I will try to migrate > them to actionloop. Ruby also is pretty slow and a migration should be > considered. Actionloop is the faster on execution for go, very close to the > fastest nodejs. > > I can contribute the benchmarks to the repo devtools if interested. > > -- > Michele Sciabarra > [email protected]
