+1 Agree with your approach to use a version "2.0.0" release of all providers.
- Matt On 2019/03/16 19:54:09, "David P Grove" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > As part of the unified release, we will be doing the first Apache release > of the OpenWhisk event providers (openwhisk-package-alarms, > openwhisk-package-cloudant, openwhisk-package-kafka). > > I've taken a look at the pending PRs, and I think only the ones I just > submitted to add DISCLAIMER.txt, etc. are release blocking. Please comment > if you disagree (or want to get in any other changes before a release). > > These components all have had non-Apache releases in the past, and thus > have a history of version numbering that we need to not confuse. > > If we want to stick with the minimal increment under semvar, the initial > Apache releases would be numbered: > alarms: 1.12.5 > cloudant: 1.9.4 > kafka: 1.4.22 > > We could also decide to do a "major" bump to allow a clean Apache vs. > non-Apache break in the version numbers. In other words, we would make > this the 2.0.0 release of all three event provider modules. > > My strong inclination is to go with 2.0.0, but I would like to hear > thoughts from others. Assuming there are no technical blockers, I would > like to initiate a formal release process for these three components early > next week. > > thanks, > > --dave >
