Hi, On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 4:10 PM Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> wrote: > ...Maybe that service can be a set of OpenWhisk Actions...that would > avoid having to deploy additional services (outside of states > persistence) while not having to make core changes...
FYI I have played more concretely with that idea and implemented a prototype that runs state machines on OpenWhisk using the Amazon States Language, with continuations, at https://github.com/bdelacretaz/openwhisk-statebox Feedback is welcome - I'll be busy with other things next week so might not reply quickly. -Bertrand
