2019-05-14 09:38:10 UTC - Joel Scheuner: Motivation: I am interested in 
exploring ways to automatically generate alternative compositions (i.e., 
deployment variations).
*Problem 1*: Using a non-default conductor action runtime `compose --kind 
nodejs:8` raises: `"error": "Initialization has failed due to: Error: Cannot 
find module 'redis'\n`. Why does a hello world example fail due to some redis 
error in a standard nodejs:8 environment (given that Redis is only required for 
parallel compositions)? What configuration is required to fix this issue?
*Problem 2*: How can I create an OpenWhisk action with a different memory size 
in composer?
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C7DJNS37W/p1557826690020100
----
2019-05-14 09:38:14 UTC - Joel Scheuner: I would like to do somethink like this 
(i.e., trying to make the memory part working):
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C7DJNS37W/p1557826694020300
----
2019-05-14 09:38:42 UTC - Joel Scheuner: 
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C7DJNS37W/p1557826722020400
----
2019-05-14 09:39:38 UTC - Joel Scheuner: Background: I managed to add a 
`--memory` flag in `bin/deploy.js` (and adapted the `generate` function in 
`conductor.js` accordingly) to change the memory size of the conductor action. 
However, the `limits: { memory: 512 }` annotation (c.f. 
<https://cloud.ibm.com/apidocs/functions#create-or-update-an-action>) didn't 
work out so far (for both conductor action and regular action). Can you give a 
hint what is required to support this feature for actions?
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C7DJNS37W/p1557826778021100
----
2019-05-14 12:49:31 UTC - Olivier Tardieu: @Alexander Klimetschek great! right… 
I forgot we deprecated this syntax. Now you code could even be more compact:
`composer.let({ objectPath }), ...` does the same thing in Javascript.
+1 : Alexander Klimetschek
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C7DJNS37W/p1557838171023000
----
2019-05-14 12:52:09 UTC - Olivier Tardieu: @Joel Scheuner right… composer today 
assumes that docker images for the node runtime contain the `redis` module. 
This is the case of all ibm images, and I believe this was the case of the base 
OpenWhisk nodejs 6 image. But the community has decided to adopt leaner images 
going forward (nodejs 8 and beyond).
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C7DJNS37W/p1557838329025200
----
2019-05-14 12:53:55 UTC - Olivier Tardieu: For now, you can either deploy the 
ibm-functions nodejs 8 image 
(<https://hub.docker.com/r/ibmfunctions/action-nodejs-v8>) or  deploy the 
composition as a zip action
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C7DJNS37W/p1557838435026400
----
2019-05-14 12:55:47 UTC - Olivier Tardieu: basically use the `--js` flag of 
composer’s `compose` command to generate the raw javascript code and then 
package that as zip file with the required modules (see: 
<https://cloud.ibm.com/docs/openwhisk?topic=cloud-functions-creating-javascript-actions#openwhisk_js_packaged_action>)
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C7DJNS37W/p1557838547027700
----
2019-05-14 12:56:46 UTC - Olivier Tardieu: going forward it makes sense for me 
to make the redis dependency optional as you suggest, but rereleasing composer 
will as usual take a few weeks
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C7DJNS37W/p1557838606028600
----
2019-05-14 12:57:22 UTC - Olivier Tardieu: I’ll open a bug to keep track of this
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C7DJNS37W/p1557838642028800
----
2019-05-14 13:00:19 UTC - Olivier Tardieu: Problem 2: hacking the limits 
parameters at line 37 of the conductor,js works for me to increase the memory 
limit on the conductor action itself
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C7DJNS37W/p1557838819030400
----
2019-05-14 13:08:24 UTC - Olivier Tardieu: another hack is needed to increase 
the limit on the composed actions
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C7DJNS37W/p1557839304031100
----
2019-05-14 13:10:28 UTC - Olivier Tardieu: in composer.js line 361:
```
if (exec) composition.action = { exec, limits: { memory: 512 } }```
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C7DJNS37W/p1557839428031900
----
2019-05-14 13:11:16 UTC - Olivier Tardieu: I can add support for setting memory 
limits via flags in the medium term
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C7DJNS37W/p1557839476032700
----
2019-05-14 13:12:37 UTC - Olivier Tardieu: FYI my hack at line 37 is:
```
return { name, action: { exec: { kind, code }, annotations, limits: { timeout, 
memory: 512 } } }
```
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C7DJNS37W/p1557839557033300
----
2019-05-14 13:13:16 UTC - Olivier Tardieu: I am not sure why your hack does not 
work, from your description of it, it looks like it should
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C7DJNS37W/p1557839596034200
----
2019-05-14 13:16:20 UTC - Olivier Tardieu: For problem 1 another alternative is 
to hack conductor.js to remove all references to redis
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C7DJNS37W/p1557839780034800
----
2019-05-14 14:02:40 UTC - Olivier Tardieu: openwhisk-composer 0.11.0 has been 
released and is available from npm, github, and apache:

Changelog:
- Annotate conductor actions with the provide-api-key annotation.
- Add --kind and --timeout flags to deploy command.
- Add --file and -o flags to compose command.
- Update documentation.

Download links:
- <https://www.npmjs.com/package/openwhisk-composer>
- <https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-composer/releases>
- <http://openwhisk.incubator.apache.org/downloads.html>
heart : chetanm
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C7DJNS37W/p1557842560035500
----
2019-05-14 14:04:09 UTC - Olivier Tardieu: was published two weeks ago but 
never announced…
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C7DJNS37W/p1557842649036200
----

Reply via email to