> [CS50] *All "important" discussions happen asynchronously in written form on > the project's main communications channel. Offline, face-to-face or private > discussions 11 that affect the project are also documented on that channel.*
Yes. And decision having wider impact is getting communicated via the 'dev` mailing list with adequate time given to respond. Slack/Github issues are at times used to quickly iterate but eventually message is discussed on dev list as well > [IN10] *The project is independent from any corporate or organizational > influence.* We now have a diverse set of people contributing to the project which belong to different companies (or act individually). May be once we document them [1] then we would have actual data point to refer to to emphasize this aspect > [IN20] *Contributors act as themselves as opposed to representatives of a > corporation or organization.* Yes. Well I can vouch for myself at least :). > [CO60] The community operates based on consensus of its members (see CS10) > who have decision power. Dictators, benevolent or not, are not welcome in > Apache projects. Yes for this as well. We have people who have been long time contributors and have a good context on various design aspects. However all changes are done via consensus and not seen any case where any decision was forcefully taken Chetan Mehrotra [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-website/issues/293 On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:04 AM Matt Rutkowski <mrutkow...@apache.org> wrote: > > and one more question to add that I missed: > > [CO60] The community operates based on consensus of its members (see CS10) > who have decision power. Dictators, benevolent or not, are not welcome in > Apache projects.
