I posted an explanation to the issue and opened a suggested patch https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-apigateway/pull/343.
-r On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 2:25 PM Rodric Rabbah <rod...@gmail.com> wrote: > I created an issue for this test failure here: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-apigateway/issues/342 > > Which implicates this line: > tenants.lua:130: attempt to compare nil with number > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-apigateway/blob/1f46de9d2f7a9420e48c533af7a4b1b6118aa130/scripts/lua/management/lib/tenants.lua#L129-L130 > > Lars - maybe you can spot the issue from that? I suspect guarding against > nil is sufficient. > > -r > > > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 1:44 PM Lars Andersson < > lars.storfiskarn.anders...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> If that PR is the cause, feel free to revert it as I have no time >> available >> right now to have a look. >> >> / Lars >> >> On Tue, 28 May 2019, 19:35 Matt Hamann <matthew.ham...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> > Looks like the failures began directly after the merging of PR #335. >> Rodric >> > and Lars were the contributors of that PR. >> > >> > I would elect to either revert the PR or ask one of the aforementioned >> to >> > investigate the failure and submit a fix. The cause of the failure is >> not >> > obvious from the build output. >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------ >> > -Matt >> > matthew.ham...@gmail.com >> > >> > >> > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 12:03 PM David P Grove <gro...@us.ibm.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > > >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > It's been 20 days since the daily test run for apigateway has >> > > actually succeeded. Spot-checking a few of the runs, it seems like a >> > > consistent failure of one test case: >> > > >> > > apigw.healthtests.ApiGwRestEndToEndTests > Wsk api should create an >> API >> > and >> > > successfully invoke that API FAILED >> > > org.scalatest.exceptions.TestFailedException: 502 was not equal to >> > 200 >> > > >> > > Does anyone have any insight into why this test is now >> failing? >> > > >> > > thanks, >> > > >> > > --dave >> > > >> > >> >
