I tweaked the wording a little Matt wrt faas/serverless. > should we say anything about supporting Cloud Native (i.e., 12-factors implied, portable to any Container framework)?
this is a good idea. "serverless" is still new and foreign to people outside the serverless bubble. -r On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 1:56 PM Matt Rutkowski <mrutkow...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On 2019/05/29 19:05:37, Matt Rutkowski <mrutkow...@apache.org> wrote: > > Dear Whiskers, > > > > As a community we have been discussing the possibility of graduation for > quite some time. In the wake of the last legal hurdle being cleared (i.e., > IBM completed transfer of all trademarks and name registrations to the ASF > board) and in anticipation of a VOTE thread, I have created a page on our > CWiki for drafting 2 artifacts we would need to present to the board as > part of the process, that is the graduated project Charter (simple, > straightforward) and the Resolution (which references the charter/project > scope) to become a Top-Level-Project (TLP). > > > > I am asking you all, as you did for the Maturity model review, to please > help develop/review/comment on these items as well: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=115526932 > > > > Note that some background and links that describe the process and > artifacts are included on the page as well. > > > > FYI, I brought this up as a topic on the agenda of today's Tech. Int. > call if you want my unedited "take" on the process and these items: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxxTLBC1QD8 > > > > Thanks for your help! > > -Matt > > > > Please check out the charter (simple sentence derived from our CWiki tag > line) on proposal page and let me know if we should amend it in any way.... > My Qs... > > do I need to say FaaS to qualify Serverless? > should we say anything about supporting Cloud Native (i.e., 12-factors > implied, portable to any Container framework)? >
