Rodric, Great reference and agree with Bertrand that we should copy Spark's stellar example.
To that end, please review PR which accomplishes that goal: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-website/pull/387/files Thanks, Matt On 2019/06/12 11:15:51, Rodric Rabbah <rod...@gmail.com> wrote: > The discussion about our graduation on the general list [1] led to a > question relating to how we manage the project trademarks. Specifically, > our project website does not provide any guidance we can point to when > needed. We have previously discussed the use of the OpenWhisk name in a > prior instance [2] but did not document our guidance on the website. Apache > Spark is one example that might be useful for reference, available at > http://spark.apache.org/trademarks.html. It provides appropriate links to > the ASF [3] and summarizes the key points of the policy. > > This email is to solicit help authoring our own project trademarks policy > summary page, and to solicit feedback on additional points to summarize > relating to the use of the name OpenWhisk. > > For example, how do we handle the use of OpenWhisk in a GitHub repository > name? A small sample of searches on popular Apache project names leads one > to believe this is quite common. In some cases it may be sufficient for > the repository to use the full project name "Apache OpenWhisk" prominently > in the project description and first mentions in the documentation (with > links to the project website). When do we require an acknowledgement of the > trademark, or ask a repository to be renamed? > > -r > > [1] > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/02dd71dcc6b2f326015954388c61d06d12f982fd64f34ee40e076171@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E > > [2] > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/99e2431472d015fb23af38d1c2dab47ef9eb5a8a980cf2b80ca0035b@%3Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org%3E > > [3] https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/faq/#products >
