If the weather package is functional and can run with newer node kinds then I’d favor keeping it.
I’d favor removing the combinators as we have composer now and we didn’t document them properly (my fault). I would consider removing the bash installers since they’re redundant with the wsk deploy manifest. I’m indifferent on version number. -r > On Jun 17, 2019, at 8:57 AM, David P Grove <gro...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > As Rodric mentioned in [1], the catalog is the last package we need to > release before we can start on the main repo. > > This is a discussion thread to figure out what (if anything) needs to be > done before we can start the release process. Here are three questions I > have: > > 1. Should we remove the Weather Company package and let interested users > get it from a downstream IBM repo, or is this a generally useful package > that we should provide in the Apache release (like Slack and Github)? > > 2. Should we remove the combinator package? (It is marked as deprecated in > the package install scripts). I think the functionality is now better > provided by Apache OpenWhisk composer, but I don't know the full history of > this package. > > 3. Should this release be numbered 0.10.0 or 1.0.0? > > --dave > > [1] > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ddf47c05e72426a47f0a414e1dd68cc6075fa4a60be1753318ebfe58@%3Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org%3E
