On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 at 20:44, David P Grove <gro...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > 3. Once we have addressed (1) and (2), we should consider opening a legal > discuss thread to see if we can continue to use /u/openwhisk (with clear > branding that /u/openwhisk is an official distribution channel from the > Apache OpenWhisk (P)PMC) or if we must migrate to /u/apacheopenwhisk or > similar.
If that discussion leads us to believe `openwhisk` must be retired in favour the full project name, this will also affect the NPM module for the JS Client SDK. https://www.npmjs.com/package/openwhisk Looking over the NPM guidelines from ASF, we comply with all of them apart from the name. I've opened an issue to track this and will wait on the legal discussion. https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-client-js/issues/169 -- Regards, James Thomas
