Carlos, >From the list, to my knowledge, none of these are actively used for current >Travis/Jenkins... do any jump out as you as ones we could not deprecate >(effectively delete)? Mainly concerned over the aberrant Swift ones that look >like early "one offs" which you may have insight on?
thx, matt On 2019/06/26 10:06:01, Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think the images being actively used by Travis or jenkins testing should > remain in the current repository their current usage should be as nightly > builds only intended for dev and build integrating testing. > > I think having the tag latest is not a big deal as it’s a default tag when > pulling containers, but I’m not going to oppose if someone wants to change it > to something like “dev” or like I had at one point “master” which then Rodric > changes to “latest” :-) > > As for the convenient binaries of the release, I think these images should be > build out of Apache jenkins server using the source code that is already > released on the “dist” directory from Apache distribution server these images > should not be in the current “openwhisk” docker namespace they should be > pushed to the Apache “docker.io/apache/incubator-openwhisk-*:version” [1] > We also need to check what are the ASF Infra requirements to host an image > under the Apache namespace like the requirement to secure the image by > signing the image or just have the digest/taghash documented for > verification. > > [1] https://hub.docker.com/u/apache > > - Carlos Santana > @csantanapr > > > On Jun 26, 2019, at 4:00 AM, Rodric Rabbah <rod...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > For the demos, the asciiart image might be from Nick M but I think we can > > extract the source into a repo from just the docker image. The spell > > checker I may have the source for. It’s a bash script which was covered in > > a blog post. > > > > Do you want to save the sources? We can make them demos under the docker > > runtime repo, if so. > > > > For ballerina I would leave it. 1.0 is slated for release soon and I’ll > > pick that up and update the runtime image. > > > > -r > > > >> On Jun 25, 2019, at 3:40 PM, Matt Rutkowski <mrutkow...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> Just made a pass through all images under the "openwhisk" moniker on > >> Docker Hub: > >> https://hub.docker.com/u/openwhisk/ > >> > >> assuring all have valid (short) descriptions and long descriptions that > >> clearly describe each belonging to our Apache project proper (adapting 2 > >> examples from other Apache projects, thanks Rodric). In addition, we > >> BOLDly indicate these are convenience binaries and point back to the our > >> Apache repos. in github where they are generated from as build artifacts. > >> > >> Along the way, I found the following images that I believe should be > >> deprecated (i.e., deleted from Docker Hub) along with my notes as to when > >> they stopped being used/generated and last build date: > >> > >> ------------------------------------------ > >> - > >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/action-ballerina-v0.975 > >> (5 months, current version action-ballerina-v0.990.2), same major > >> version, not sure who is maintaining > >> > >> ------------------------------------------- > >> replaced by ow-utils: > >> > >> - > >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/ansible-runner > >> (7 months, replaced bu ow-utils image > >> > >> - > >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/script-runner > >> (7 months, replaced bu ow-utils image) > >> * deprecated by this PR: > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/4158 > >> > >> ---------------------------------------- > >> > >> Kube related: > >> > >> - > >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/kube-whisk-ansible-runner > >> (10 months, replaced by ansible-runner) > >> > >> - > >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/kube-whisk-script-runner > >> (10 months, replaced by script-runner) > >> > >> - > >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/kube-kafkapkginstaller > >> (1 year+) > >> - > >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/kube-routemgmt > >> - > >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/kube-openwhisk-catalog > >> * deprecated by these PRs > >> * https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-deploy-kube/pull/239 > >> (Kubernetes YAML removed) > >> * https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-deploy-kube/pull/249 > >> (Dockerfile removed) > >> > >> - > >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/kube-couchdb > >> * deprecated by these PRs > >> * https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-deploy-kube/pull/239 > >> (Kubernetes YAML removed) > >> * https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-deploy-kube/pull/261 > >> (uses ow-utils and initdb.sh script to run ansible playbooks in main OW) > >> > >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/kube-docker-pull > >> (now uses ow-utils as part of “helpers”) > >> * deprecated by these PRs: > >> * https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-deploy-kube/pull/249 > >> * https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-deploy-kube/pull/209 > >> > >> --------------------------------------------- > >> Not sure of the history of Swift, but it appears that some of these images > >> were early (dev.,test) attempts at publishing to DockerHub: > >> > >> - > >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/action-swift-v4.0 > >> (1 year+) > >> - > >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/action-swift-v4 > >> (1 year+) > >> - > >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/swift3action > >> (2+ years ago) > >> --------------------------------------------- > >> > >> Early dev/test images? > >> - > >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/couchdb-snapshot > >> (2+ years ago) > >> - > >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/couchdb-catalog > >> (2+ years ago) > >> > >> --------------------------------------------- > >> > >> Also, found these old Docker SDK samples/demos? which would love to know > >> where the source code exists for the actual code to see if we want to use > >> as our own examples and automate builds for (perhaps as part of the SDK). > >> > >> Note: > >> * they referenced bluemix home page… REMOVED > >> * with the quote "This image demonstrates OpenWhisk's support for > >> executing arbitrary code in a safe manner. Bring your own docker image.”. > >> * Single tag “latest” (single push) > >> > >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/javaaction > >> (2+ years ago) > >> * No description > >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/thumbnail > >> (3+ years ago) > >> * A example docker image that creates a polaroid-style thumbnail from a > >> given image URL. > >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/asciiart > >> (3+ years ago) > >> * A example docker image that creates a polaroid-style thumbnail from a > >> given image URL. > >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/spellcheck > >> (3+ years ago) > >> * A example docker image that includes a spell client that interfaces with > >> aspell. (sic) > >> > >> Please comment if these can/should be deleted or if not please let us know > >> why and how we proceed to make current. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Matt > >> >
